10/29/2023 0 Comments Blood in blood out hot wheels![]() ![]() The chief fallacy of using the above argument to prove that JW’s do not abstain from blood lies in the unproven/conditional nature of its first premise: "To use from is not to abstain from," or “If a JW uses from blood, then he is not abstaining from blood.” The opposer is attempting to sneak in a “modus ponens” and pretend that his conclusion is automatically made sound because it is valid structurally. ![]() ![]() Therefore, the JW has not abstained from blood 1.2 The Problem of the Opposer’s Argument from a Logical Perspective If a JW uses from blood, then he is not abstaining from blood
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |